Calendar
ecology montage Home
News
Syllabus
Calendar
Lessons
eReserve
Contact
Help 

.

Students Along  A River

 

© 2003
University of Idaho
Web Design - CTI

 Calendar : FALL 2003

 
Use this calendar to stay current on lesson duration times and due dates. Also provided is a complete listing of eReserve readings for each lesson.

Calendar Icon Calendar for Lessons: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 

  Lesson 1
Timeframe: 8/25 - 9/7

 
1.3 Group Project 

Due: 9/7

Complete Lesson 1 By: 9/7
Duration 2 Weeks
 

Lesson 1 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
Books:
bulletpp. 1-40, Restoration of Aquatic Systems (RAS)
bullet pp. 1-1 to 1-4, In Stream Corridor Restoration (SCR)

Articles:
bulletJosselyn, M., and S. Chamberlain. 1993. History: The way it was. California coast and ocean. 9(3):20-23.
bulletCooke, G.D. 1999. Ecosystem rehabilitation. Lake and Reservoir Management 15(1):14.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 2
Timeframe: 9/7 - 9/21

 
2.1 AR Goal Definition 

Due: 9/11

2.3 NRV Short Paper Due:  9/13 
2.4 Goals Short Paper Group Discussion & Summary Due: 9/17
2.5 Short Paper Due: 9/21
Complete Lesson 2 By: 9/21
Duration 2 Weeks
 

Lesson 2 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
Books:
bulletpp. 41-54, Restoration of Aquatic Systems (RAS)
bullet pp. 5-1 to 5-23, In Stream Corridor Restoration (SCR)

Articles:
bulletNothing listed so far

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 3
Timeframe: 9/21 - 10/5

 
3.2 AR Plan Review 

Due: TBA

3.3 Group Project Due: TBA
Complete Lesson 3 By: 10/5
Duration 2 Weeks
 

Lesson 3 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
Books:
bulletpp. 55-70 , Restoration of Aquatic Systems (RAS)

Articles:
bulletHill, M.T., and W.S. Platts. 1998. A case study in the Owens River Gorge, California. Fisheries 23(11):18-27
bulletSommer, T., B. Harrell, M. Nobriag, R. Brown, P. Moyle, W. Kimmerer, and L. Schemel. 2001. California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetland, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries 26(8):6-16.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 4
Timeframe: 10/5 - 10/26

 
4.2 Group Project

Due: TBA

Live Chat Group A 

 

4.5 Design Plan

Due: 10/26

Complete Lesson 4 By: 10/26
Duration 3 weeks
 

Lesson 4 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
Books:
bulletpp. 165-206, 209-248, 398-496 , Restoration of Aquatic Systems (RAS)
bullet pp. 1-1 to 1-32, 2-1 to 2-87, 3-1 to 3-28, Appendix A, 8-1 to 8-102, 9-1 to 9-49, In Stream Corridor Restoration (SCR)

Articles:
bulletFrissell, C.A., and S.C. Ralph. 1998. Stream and watershed restoration. pp. 599-610 In: River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal ecoregion (R.J. Naiman and R.E. Bilby, eds.). Springer, New York, NY.
bulletBayley, P.B. 1995. Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience 45(3):153-158.
bulletJohnson, B.L., W.B. Richardson, and T.J. Naimo. 1995. Past, Present, and future concepts in large river ecology. Bioscience 45(3):134-145.
bulletGore, J.A., and F.D. Shields Jr. 1995. Can large rivers be restored? Bioscience 45(3):142-152.
bulletHill, M.T., and W.S. Platts. 1998. A case study in the Owens River Gorge, California. Fisheries 23(11):18-27
bulletIndependent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP). 1999. Second round project review comments in reference to Project ID:9303501: Enhance fish, riparian, and wildlife habitat within the Red River Watershed, Idaho. County Soil and Water Conservation District. ISRP response evaluation. www.nwppc.org.
bulletBeaver, F., M. Johnson, L. Kingery, J. Warne, and D. Rush. 2001. Riparian restoration of a reach of the Turtle River utilizing soil bioengineering. Land and Water 45(5):6-8.
bulletSchmetterling, D.A., C.G. Clancy, and T.M. Brandt. Effects of riprap bank reinforcement on stream salmonids in the western United States. Fisheries. 26 (7):6-13.
bulletSchroeder, K., and C. Savonen. 1997. Lessons from floods. Fisheries 22(9):14-16.
bulletWeiner, A.H. 1998. Kenai River restoration and management. Fisheries 23(1):6-10
bulletWilliams, P. 1993. Los Angeles River: Overflowing with controversy. California Coast and Ocean 9(3):8-19; 24-30.
bulletMeador, M.R., and A.O. Layher. 1998. Instream sand and gravel mining: Environmental issues and regulatory process in the United States. Fisheries 23(11):6-13.
bulletRoni, P., T.J. Beechie, R.E. Bilby, F.E. Leonetti, M.M. Pollock, and G.R. Pess. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. In Press: North American Journal of Fisheries Management.
bulletNewcombe, C.P., and D.D. MacDonald. 1991. Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:72-82.
bulletBilby, R.E., and G.E. Likens. 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61(5):1107-1113.
bulletKauffman, J.B., R.L. Beschta, N.Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22(5):12-24.
bulletBriggs, M.K. 1996. Natural recovery in riparian systems. pp. 45-60 In: Riparian ecosystem recovery in natural lands: Strategies and references. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 5
Timeframe: 10/27 - 11/16

 
Update 

Update

Complete Lesson 5 By: 11/16
Duration 3 Weeks
 

Lesson 5 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
bulletCooke, G.D., E.B. Welch, S.A. Peterson, and P.R. Newroth. 1993. Aquatic plant control by preventive, manual, and mechanical methods. Chapter 12 In: Restoration and management of lakes and reservoirs (2nd edition). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
bulletLind, O.T., R. Doyle, D.S. Vodpich, B.G. Trotter, J.G. Limon, and L.Davalos-Lind. 1992. Clay turbidity: Regulation of phytoplankton production in a large, nutrient-rich tropical lake. Limnology and Oceanography 37(3):549-565.
bulletRichardson, J.B. 2001. Techniques to reduce phosphorous and sediments in a Midwestern glacial lake. Land and Water 45(5):9-12.
bulletU.S.E.P.A. 1990a. Lake and reservoir restoration and management techniques. pp. 120-159 in: The lake and reservoir restoration guidance manual. EPA-440/4-90-006. Office of Water (WH 553). Washington, D.C. August, 1990.
bulletU.S.E.P.A. 1990b. Evaluating lake restoration techniques. pp.4-16 - 5-10; 5-15 - 5-25; 5-30 - 5-33 In: Monitoring lake anf reservoir restoration. EPA 440/4-90-007. Office of Water (WH 553). Washington, D.C. August, 1990.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 6
Timeframe: 11/17 - 11/30

 
Update 

Update

Complete Lesson 6 By: 11/30
Duration 2 Weeks
 

Lesson 6 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
bulletInteragency Workgroup on Wetland restoration. 2001. An introduction to wetland restoration, creation, and enhancement: A guide for the public. USEPA, NOAA, USCEC, USF&WS, and NRCS. www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/draftintro.html.
bulletHammer, D.A. 1992. Wetlands: Functions and values. pp. 69-103 In: Creating freshwater wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
bulletSommer, T., B. Harrell, M. Nobriag, R. Brown, P. Moyle, W. Kimmerer, and L. Schemel. 2001. California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetland, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries 26(8):6-16.
bulletSparks, R.E. 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45(3):168-182
bulletHoag, J.C., S.K. Wyman, G. Bentrup, and others. 2001. User's guide to description, propagation, and establishment of wetland plant species and grasses for riparian areas in the intermountain west. ID Technical Note 38. USDA-NRCS, Boise, ID. Feb. 2001.
bulletDean, T., Z. Ferdana, J. White, and C. Tanner. 2000. Skagit estuary restoration assessment, Puget Sound, Washington. People for Puget Sound (Seattle, WA) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Lacey, WA).
bulletMitsch, W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands definitions, status, and major regional wetlands in North america. Pp. 21-63 In: Wetlands (2nd edition). Van Nostrand reinhold, New York, NY.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 7
Timeframe: 12/1 - 12/10

 
Update 

Update

Complete Lesson 7 By: 12/10
Duration 1 Week +
 

Lesson 7 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
bulletKondolf, G.M., and E.R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19(1):1-15.
bulletKondolf, G.M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3(2):133-136.
bulletRoni, P., M. Liermann, and A. Steel. 2002. Monitoring and evaluating responses of salmonids and other fishes to instream restoration. In Press: Montgomery, D.R., S. Bolton, and D.B. Booth (eds.). Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers, University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.
bulletBerry, K.A., and E.M. Spence. 2001. The cookbook doesn't work: Erosion and sediment control on steep slopes with highly erodible soils. Land and Water 45(5):23-28.
bulletU.S.E.P.A. 1990b. Evaluating lake restoration techniques. pp. 4-16 - 5-10; 5-15 - 5-25; 5-30 - 5-33 In: Monitoring lake and reservoir restoration. EPA 440/4-90-007, Office of Water (WH-553). Washington, D.C. August, 1990.

 

Top of Page
 

 Lesson 8
Timeframe: 12/11 - 12/14

 
 

Lesson 8 Readings

Articles on eReserve

 
bulletU.S.E.P.A. 2001. Coeur d'Alene Basin Cleanup Plan; Notice of Availability. USEPA Region X, Seattle, WA.
bulletFrissell, C.A., and S.C. Ralph. 1998. Stream and watershed restoration. pp. 610-624 In: River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal ecoregion (R.J. Naiman and R.E. Bilby, eds.). Springer, New York, NY.
bulletDombeck, M.P., J.E. Williams, and C.A. Wood. 1997. Watershed restoration: Social and scientific challenges for fish biologists. Fisheries 22(5):26-27.
bulletRoper, B.B., J.J. Dose, and J.E. Williams. 1997. Stream restoration: Is fisheries biology enough? Fisheries 22(5):6-11.
bulletHobbs, R.J., and J.A. Harris. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration ecology 9(2):239-246.
bulletBottom, D.L. 1995. Restoring salmon ecosystems: Myth and reality. Restoration and management notes 13(2):162-170.

                                       *******

FINAL EXAM   -   12/15 - 12/19

Top of Page