UNIVERSITY HOME                                                                                                                      LOCATIONS | A-Z INDEX | DIRECTORY | TODAY AT IDAHO
   Extension Forestry        

Home Calendar of Events Stewardship Programs Idaho Big Tree Program Tree Clinic Publications & Links Where to Find Help Contact Us

Publications & Links

Woodland NOTES - Vol. 15, No. 2 - Spring/Summer, 2004

In this issue:


 

 

 

 

 


Where in the world is Ribes?
Chris Schnepf

Many Idaho forest owners are familiar with the disease called white pine blister rust. White pine blister rust was introduced to the western North America in 1910 on infected seedlings from France. The disease devastated western white pine forests, since white pine had very little natural resistance to the disease.

Blister rust does not spread directly from tree to tree. It has a complex life cycle that requires a shrub in the genus Ribes (gooseberries and currants) to produce the spores that infect white pine. Without this alternate host, white pine cannot be infected by blister rust.

From the 1930s through the 1960s, many people were employed to remove Ribes plants in an effort to reduce blister rust infections on white pine. Ribes eradication has been given up as a method to control blister rust (in part because Ribes seeds survive many years in the forest floor), but Ribes density still figures into decisions to plant, thin, or prune white pine.

Identifying Ribes. Ribes can be difficult for a novice (and many not-so-novices) to identify. Ribes plants are typically 2-3 feet tall, but grow as tall as 7 feet. They have small maple-like leaves and small, pea-sized fruits developing in late summer. A number of Ribes species are found in the Inland Northwest, but prickly currant and sticky currant are the most common in forests. Prickly currant (Ribes lacustre) is distinguished by many small, sharp prickles and small glossy-green leaves. It also has dark purple berries covered with hairs. Sticky currant (Ribes viscosissimum) has a velvety leaf covered with soft, sticky hairs on both surfaces. It feels moist to the touch and has blue-black, sticky berries.
Many forest plants are frequently mistaken for Ribes. The plants described below all have vaguely maple-like leaves and occur as shrubs of varying sizes. Also, many plant characteristics (e.g. leaf size, color) change with the season and the site (smaller & paler on dry sites and earlier in season) These tips should help key you in to characteristics that quickly distinguish these plants from Ribes. Flowers are an excellent way distinguish between many of these plants, but are not available all season, so we have focused on other plant characteristics.

  • Thimbleberry (Rubus parvifolius). In the early summer, thimbleberry’s young undeveloped leaves make it easy to confuse with sticky currant. Later in the summer, this plant is easily distinguished by its large leaves (4-6 inches across). Thimbleberry leaves are soft, but they are not moist like sticky currant. Thimbleberry stems are glandular, as distinguished from Ribes stems which are woody. In mid-summer thimbleberry has half-dollar sized white flowers, that later develop into large, vivid scarlet berries similar to raspberries.

  • Ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceous). The main feature that distinguishes ninebark from Ribes is its brown, papery, shredding bark. Older bark on sticky currant also shreds, but it is more reddish in color. Ninebark usually has clusters of dry, brown fruits (not berries). Ninebark also has hairs underneath the leaf that look “star-like” when magnified by a hand lens.

  • Goldthread (Coptis occidentalis). Goldthread is a low-growing plant with small, shiny evergreen leaves reminiscent of prickly currant. Growth habit is the primary characteristic that distinguishes goldthread from Ribes. Goldthread normally trails along no more than 6 inches above the ground. Roots are also a good key. Rub the outer bark off goldthread’s roots and you will see a yellowish-golden color that gives the plant its name.

  • Ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor). Ocean spray is typically a larger shrub than Ribes with clusters of arching stems. It is also distinguished by coarsely toothed leaves that are more “oak-like” than “maple-like”, a large white spongy pith, and dense pyramid shaped clusters of tiny flowers that are white in summer, then turn brown and hang on through the winter.

  • Raspberry (“Blackcaps”) (Rubus spp.). Raspberries are often confused with prickly currant because of their prickles. Raspberries frequently occur as a trailing vine, but you occasionally see single, upright, 2-3 foot tall raspberry stalks – a form prickly currant takes as well. The key feature to distinguishing between the two are raspberry’s compound leaves (with three leaflets like strawberry).

  • Rocky Mountain Maple (Acer glabrum). Rocky Mountain maple is occasionally confused with Ribes because of the leaf shape. The quickest way to distinguish between the two is to look at leaf and branch arrangement; maples have opposite arrangement; Ribes has alternate arrangement.

Photos are obviously very valuable in identifying these plants. The following reference guides will also be a great help, whether you are trying to assess blister rust hazard, or just want to be able to identify forest shrubs:

  • Field Guide to Forest Plants of Northern Idaho. 1985. Field guide to forest plants of northern Idaho. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report. INT-180. 246 pp.

  • Plants of Southern Interior British Columbia. 1996. Parish, Coupe, & Lloyd. Lone Pine publishing, Redmond, WA. 463 pp.

Special thanks to Steve Brunsfield and John Schwandt for review and comment.


Sudden Oak Death
Yvonne C. Barkley

Sudden oak death syndrome (SOD) was first reported in the Netherlands and Germany in 1993, causing leaf-blight, stem cankers, and tip dieback on nursery grown rhododendrons and viburnums. SOD has become the latest serious threat to plant materials across the United States and was first spotted in the U.S. in 1995 on tanoak in a Marin County, CA forest. It took University of California researchers until 2001 to positively identify the pathogen, after which the USDA imposed a federal quarantine of 12 California counties.

During the summer of 2001, SOD was also found killing wild rhododendrons in Brookings, OR. Infected plants were eradicated soon after sites were found and this infestation remains confined within a 9-mile quarantined area of forested land near Brookings. The initial source of infection of these sites remains unknown.

In the spring of 2003, SOD was found in a wholesale nursery in Portland, OR and also in a retail outlet in Washington that received plants from the Oregon wholesaler. Genera affected were Pieris, Viburnum, and Rhododendron. Infected stock and other nearby host plants were destroyed. This outbreak is suspected to have come from an international shipment of rhododendrons.

On March 25, 2004, SOD was confirmed on plants at Monrovia Growers in Azusa, CA and Specialty Plants, Inc. in San Marcos, CA. On March 29, 2004, the US Department of Agriculture put all 1,500 nurseries in California under a 60-day quarantine. Each nursery has been inspected for symptoms of SOD and released if no symptoms were found.

To date, there are confirmed trace forwards on stock from Monrovia in 14 states: California, Alabama, Florida, Washington, Oregon, Texas, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, New Mexico, Tennessee, and Virginia (Situation Report #43, May 25, 2004).

Cause and Hosts. SOD is caused by the fungus-like organism Phytophthora ramorum (P. ramorum), and causes different symptoms on different hosts. Called sudden oak death when it occurs on susceptible tree species, P. ramorum is characterized by bleeding cankers that girdle the trunks. On affected shrub species, the disease is called Ramorum leaf and shoot blight and is characterized by leaf blights and shoot diebacks. Unfortunately, on many plant species symptoms of P. ramorum may be indistinguishable from other common Phytophthora fungal diseases.

Phytophthora ramorum is well adapted to cool, wet conditions and tolerates heat and drought. Unlike other species in this large fungal family that usually infect roots, P. ramorum is mainly a foliar pathogen. It produces several types of spores, which helps the organism survive and spread. Spores landing on wet leaves or stems germinate and infect young plant tissues. Several of the spore types can be moved with windborne rain, in irrigation water, or with water splashed onto foliage by sprinkler irrigation. P. ramorum is also thought to move in soil and on infected plant material.

As of this writing there are 60 hosts and associated host species in at least 12 plant families (see Table 1 and Table 2 below).

Symptoms.

On trees:

P. ramorum can affect just the bark, as on beech, or both the bark and the leaves, as on tanoak. It is also possible that some trees like ash, which has highly susceptible leaves experimentally (but has not yet been found to be a natural host) may just be leaf hosts to the pathogen. Bark infections occur as large cankers on the lower trunk that are brown to black discolored areas on the outer bark and "bleed" dark red sap. Mottled areas of dead and discolored inner bark with black lines around the edges are visible when the bark is removed. A rapid change in the color and condition of the foliage, followed by sudden death of the tree, occur when cankers girdle the trunks of affected trees. Cankers can cause sudden death, as in California tanoak, or a slow decline over several years, as in American oak species. Cankers do not extend below the soil line and do not appear to infect the roots.

On leaves:

Leaf infections appear as brown to black dead areas, often at the tip or base of a leaf. Shoots can also be affected and appear brown to black in color and may wilt.

Symptoms on specific species include:

  • On conifers in the U.S.: needle blight and dieback of young shoots of Douglas fir, coastal redwood, and grand fir.

  • On yew: needle blight of young foliage resulting in aerial dieback.

  • On Rhododendron, Pieris, Vaccinium, and Hamamelis spp. (witchhazel): affected shoots or twigs develop a brown to black discoloration that spreads along the twig and can spread into the leaf via the petiole; characteristics symptoms are a blackening of the petiole, leaf base, and leaf tip that may extend along the mid-vein; twig cankers lead to wilting of affected shoots; development of symptoms can be rapid.

  • On viburnum: infection commonly occurs at the base of the stem, causing wilting and then death. May also cause brown to black leaf infections and can also affect flowers, especially on evergreen species.

  • On Camellia, Kalmia, Syringa (lilac) and Leucothoe spp.: usually confined to leaf infections; leaf lesions are brown to black and typically occur at the tip or edges of the leaf; some shoots may become infected, leading to dieback.

Two websites with good symptom pictures on various host plants are:

cropandsoil.oregonstate.edu/people/faculty/parke/OSUPramorum.pdf

www.defra.gov.uk/planth/pestnote/newram.pdf

Management. Management efforts have been focused on eradicating the pathogen where it is found and preventing new infections. Early detection is vital to preventing the disease from spreading.

In order to limit the spread of this disease, homeowners with a suspected plant infected with P. ramorum should contact your nearest Extension Office and ask them about collecting a sample of the plant.

Idaho Growers may submit a sample directly. PLEASE FOLLOW THE PROTOCOL LISTED BELOW.

1. Suspect plant material must be placed in double ziplock bags and stored in a refrigerator awaiting shipment to a diagnostic facility. The preferred method for shipment is triple packaging: two ziplock bags and an outer container. The outer shipping container should be an approved cardboard shipping box. The seams of the box should be closed with approved shipping tape.

2. Include the following information with the sample:

• Host.
• Collector’s name, and date.
• Number of hosts at that site.
• Facility/location name and address, contact person, and county.
• Other potential hosts at the site and any observations.

3. Samples should be shipped via overnight delivery or hand delivered to:

S. Krishna Mohan
Professor of Plant Pathology
University of Idaho
29603 U of I Lane
Parma, ID 83660
Phone: (208) 722-6701 Ext. 218
Fax: (208) 722-6708

4. All tools and other equipment must be sanitized and/or sterilized before re-use.

Control. Phytophthora ramorum has only recently been described and knowledge of how the disease develops and spreads is limited. Currently, fungicides are being used as preventative treatments on known host plants. Most of the fungicides used to control other Phytophthora species do not control this organism; they can only prevent it from becoming established.

For more information on Phytophthora ramorum go to the USDA APHIS website at:

www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ispm/sod/

Host Plants for Phytophthora ramorum

Scientific Name (29)

Common Name

Acer macrophyllum

Bigleaf maple

Aesculus californica

California buckeye

Arbutus menziesii

Madrone

Arctostaphylos manzanita

Manzanita

Camellia japonica

Japanese camellia

Camellia sasanqua

Sasanqua camellia

Hamamelis virginiana

Witch hazel

Heteromeles arbutifolia

Toyon

Lithocarpus densiflorus

Tanoak

Lonicera hispidula  

California honeysuckle

Pieris formosa

Himalaya pieris

Pieris formosa x japonica

Pieris ‘Forest Flame’

Pieris floribunda x japonica

Pieris ‘Brouwer’s Beauty’

Pieris japonica

Japanese pieris

Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii

Douglas-fir

Quercus agrifolia

Coast live oak

Quercus chrysolepis

Canyon live oak

Quercus kelloggii

California black oak

Quercus parvula v. shrevei

Shreve’s oak

Rhamnus californica

California coffeeberry

Rhododendron spp

Rhododendron (including azalea)

Rosa gymnocarpa

Wood rose

Sequoia sempervirens

Coast redwood 

Trientalis latifolia

Western starflower

Umbellularia californica

California bay laurel, pepperwood, Oregon myrtle

Vaccinium ovatum

Evergreen huckleberry

Viburnum x bodnantense

Bodnant Viburnum

Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum

Doublefile Viburnum

Viburnum tinus

Laurustinus

Plants Associated with Phytophthora ramorum

Scientific Name  (31)

Common Name, Date  & Source of Report

Abies grandis

Grand fir – June 03 (1)

Aesculus hippocastanum

Horse-chestnut – Dec 03 (3)

Arbutus unedo

Strawberry tree –  Dec 02 (7)

Camellia reticulata

Camellia –  Oct 03 (3)

Camellia x williamsii

Camellia – Oct 03 (3)

Castanea sativa

Sweet Chestnut –  Feb 04 (3)

Corylus cornuta

California hazelnut –  Dec 02 (5)

Fagus sylvatica

European beech – Dec 03 (3)

Kalmia latifolia

Mountain laurel – Fall 02 (3)

Leucothoe fontanesiana

Drooping leucothoe - Oct 03 (3)

Pieris formosa var.  forrestii

Chinese pieris – Oct 03 (3)

Pieris formosa var.  forrestii  x Pieris japonica

Pieris – Oct 03 (3)

Pittosporum undulatum

Victorian box – Dec 02 (6)

Pyracantha koidzumii

Formosa firethorn – Apr 04 (9)

Quercus cerris

European turkey oak - Feb 04 (3)

Quercus falcata

Southern red oak – Nov 03 (3)

Quercus ilex

Holm oak – Dec 03 (3)

Quercus rubra

Northern red oak – Nov 03 (8)

Rhamnus purshiana

Cascara –  Dec 02 (4)

Rubus spectabilis

Salmonberry –  Dec 02 (4)

Syringa vulgaris

Lilac – 2003 (3) updated Oct 03

Taxus baccata

European yew – Aug 03 (3)

Toxicodendron  diversiloba

Poison oak –  Dec 02 (4)

Vaccinium vitis-idaea

Lingonberry – Poland, 2002 (reported by 3)

Viburnum davidii

David Viburnum - Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum farreri (=V. fragrans)

Fragrant Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum lantana

Wayfaringtree Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum opulus

European cranberrybush Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum x burkwoodii

Burkwood Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum x carlcephalum x V. utile

Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

Viburnum x pragense

Prague Viburnum – Oct 03 (3)

1 California Department of Food and Agriculture
2
Oregon Department of Agriculture
3
Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, UK
4
Everett Hanson, Oregon State University
5
David Rizzo, University of California – Davis
6
Mateo Garbelotto, University of California - Berkeley
7
Eduardo Moralejo, Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB) - Balearic Islands, Spain
8
Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, Netherlands
9
Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canada 

Plants Associated with Phytophthora ramorum:
Associated plants are those found naturally infected from which P. ramorum has been cultured and/or detected using PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction).  For each of these, traditional Koch’s postulates have not yet been completed or documented and reviewed.
This list is constantly being updated.
The most current version is posted at:  http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ispm/sod

Rationale for Lists:

Host Plants for Phytophthora ramorum: Host plants are those adapted from other regulated lists or those added upon completion, documentation and review of traditional Koch’s postulates.  Some are regulated in part (such as redwood and Douglas fir); others are regulated in their entirety (such as tanoak and western star flower).  Details on regulated articles can be found via links to “Phytophthora ramorum 7 CFR 301.92” and “Recent Modifications to Phytophthora ramorum Regulations” at:  http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ispm/sod

Parts of this article were excerpted from:

Feiber, D. 2004. Sudden Oak Death Detected on Plants Imported into Florida. News Release, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, FL.

Parke, J. J. Pscheidt, and R. Linderman. 2003. Phytophthora ramorum: a guide for Oregon nurseries. EM 8840, Oregon State University, Extension Service. 8 pp.

Unknown. 2001. Phytophthora ramorum (Sudden Oak Death). Pest Fact Sheet, Plant Health Risk Assessment Unit, Science Division, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources, Canada.

Unknown. 2004. Phytophthora ramorum: a threat to our trees, woodland and heartland. DEFRA, Edinburgh, UK. www.defra.gov.uk/planth/ph.htm

Unknown. 2004. USDA Announces Oak Disease Detection Program for California Nurseries. News Release, USDA APHIS Program Update, March 29, 2004.

Unknown. 2004. New Restrictions for P. ramorum. News Release, USDA APHIS Program Update, April 9, 2004.

 


Silviculture Decisions VIII: Can Timber Harvest Help Reach Non-Timber Goals?
Ron Mahoney

Without exception, surveys of family forest owners’ attitudes and goals show that other benefits of owning forest land are often more important to them than profit from timber sales. Some of these family forest owners need or desire financial profit from selling wood products, but fear losing other values. Others may reject active management on the premise that "I don’t want to manage my land, I want it to stay just the way it is". This notion has some positive factors, including:

  • The owner can relax, let nature take its course.

  • Natural cycles can be observed without direct interference.

  • No additional direct investment is required.

  • Control is not given up to loggers or advisors (control is given to nature).

There are also some negative factors of "do nothing" ownership, including:

  • Predictable natural changes may be contrary to expectations.

  • Uninvolved owners may have less incentive to observe and understand natural cycles.

  • There is less opportunity for family involvement.

  • It is considered unresponsible stewardship by some.

  • It may cause legal problems with taxes, inheritance or liability.

  • Most forests are already altered from their natural state by past logging fire exclusion, or landscape-level influences, including roads, air movement, insects and diseases, climate change, and other off-property factors.

Family forest owners’ non-timber goals often include preserving natural beauty, enhancing wildlife habitat, seeing wildlife, personal satisfaction of owning and stewarding land, sentimental attachment including family legacy, and personal recreation. Financial goals can include income from timber sales and livestock grazing, and in some cases, fee hunting.

Timber harvesting can help reach some of these goals by managing plant and animal habitat and species diversity, providing access for a variety of management and enjoyment activities, reducing insect and disease problems, producing short and long-term income which can fund land mortgages and non-timber management, and enhancing natural nutrient cycling for a healthier forest.

Family forest owners should remember that green plants and the soil they grow in are the basis for all ecosystems, and that trees are the dominant plants in the forest. What happens to the trees affects everything else. And what happens to everything else affects the trees. Change happens whether or not you actively manage. Well planned and executed timber harvests, whether thinning or partial cutting, or restoring a more healthy, appropriate forest for a site by final harvest and regenerating with new trees, can have beneficial effects. To achieve most non-timber goals, change must be managed. The natural resource professionals who assist family forest owners don’t have a perfect knowledge, but they can reliably predict, plan, and affect change in ways that can meet a landowners’ goals with a high degree of success.

Family forest owners should decide why they own their land, write it down, and then prioritize their goals. Reading, attending workshops, and consulting with natural resource professionals can help forest owners understand the opportunities and limitations of their land, whether their ownership goals are attainable, and how to achieve them. There are many resources available through the UI Extension Forestry offices, government agencies, landowner organizations, books, articles and other publications.