UNIVERSITY HOME                                                                                                                      LOCATIONS | A-Z INDEX | DIRECTORY | TODAY AT IDAHO
   Extension Forestry        

Home Calendar of Events Stewardship Programs Idaho Big Tree Program Tree Clinic Publications & Links Where to Find Help Contact Us

Publications & Links

Woodland NOTES - Vol.16, No. 1, Fall/Winter 2004-2005

In this issue:


 

 

 

 

 


Colored Leaves and Needles Means Fall in Idaho
Yvonne C. Barkley

Come autumn, deciduous trees and shrubs turn color and lose their leaves. Everyone expects this to happen in the fall. A tree’s roots, branches, and twigs can endure freezing temperatures, but most leaves cannot. Thin, tender leaves are made up of cells filled with water sap, which freeze in winter. As the water in the cells expands as it freezes, the cells burst and irreparable damage is done. Because of this, any plant tissue unable to live through the winter must be sealed off and shed to ensure the tree’s survival. As sunlight decreases in autumn, the veins that carry sap into and out of a leaf gradually close. A layer of cells, called the separation layer, forms at the base of the leaf stem. When this layer is complete, the leaf is separated from the tissue that connected it to the branch and it falls. Oak leaves are the exception. The separation layer never fully detaches the dead oak leaves, and they remain on the tree through winter and only fall in the spring when they are "pushed off" by newly emerging leaves in the spring.

Coniferous (often called evergreen) trees also lose their leaves, they just do it a bit differently. Conifer leaves are needles that are covered with a heavy wax coating and the fluids inside the cells contain substances that resist freezing. Needles can live for several years before they fall and are replaced by new growth. Natural foliar shedding varies with the species of evergreen. Pines lose their third year needles, those closest to the trunk. The needles turn brown to red-brown (the dryer the year, the brighter the color) and are cast, sometimes all in one day if there is a good wind. Arborvitae and related species with scalelike leaves shed their oldest branchlets (those in the interior). Spruce and fir bear several age classes of needles along their branches and shedding is not restricted to the oldest age class, although it is concentrated there. The foliage on a given branch segment of these species may brown and thin progressively over 2 to 3 years.

And those deciduous trees and shrubs? Why do they change color anyway? Leaf color comes from pigments, which are natural substances produced by leaf cells. The three pigments that color leaves are chlorophyll (green), carotenoid (yellow, orange, and brown), and anthocyanins (red). Chlorophyll is the most important of the three. Without the chlorophyll in leaves, trees wouldn’t be able to use sunlight to produce food (photosynthesis). Carotenoids create bright yellows and oranges in familiar fruits and vegetables, while anthocyanins add the color red to plants. Chlorophyll and carotenoid are in leaf cells all the time during the growing season. The green of the pigment chlorophyll covers the yellows and oranges of the pigment carotenoid during the summer, giving us green leaves. Not all trees can make anthocyanins, and most anthocyanins are produced only under certain conditions.

As the days get shorter and the temperatures start to drop, trees respond by producing less chlorophyll. As chlorophyll levels drop, the carotenoid already in the leaves can finally show through and leaves become a bright rainbow of glowing yellows, sparkling oranges, and warm browns. While the yellow, gold, and orange colors created by carotenoid remain fairly constant from year to year, anthocyanins (which give leaves the bright, brilliant shades of red, purple and crimson) will vary. In some years, the red fall colors seem brighter and more spectacular than in other years. Both temperature and cloud cover can make a big difference in a tree’s red colors from year to year. A series of warm, sunny autumn days and cool but not freezing nights provides the perfect conditions for a fall with a lot of reds. This is because during warm, sunny days leaves can produce lots of sugar, but cool nights prevent the sugar sap from flowing through the leaf veins and down into the branches and trunk, where it is used by the plant. Researchers have found that anthocyanins are produced as a form of protection and allow the plant to recover the "lost" nutrients from the leaves before they fall off. This insures that the tree will have adequate nutrients for the next growing season.

The amount of rain in a year also affects autumn leaf color. A severe drought can delay the arrival of fall colors by a few weeks, and sometimes the leaves just turn brown and drop without much color. A warm, wet period during fall will lower the intensity, or brightness, of autumn colors. A severe frost will kill the leaves, turning them brown and causing them to drop early. The best autumn colors occur when there’s been a warm, wet spring, a summer that’s not too hot or dry, and a fall with plenty of warm sunny days and cool nights.

Warm days and crisp nights. Apples and hunting. The smell of those colored leaves and pine needles as you crunch them under your feet. That’s fall in Idaho!


Top 10 worst reasons to not prepare your home for forest fires
Chris Schnepf

When teaching landscaping for fire prevention workshops and interacting with people who have read articles we have written on the topic, I have heard a lot of excuses for not preparing homes for fire. This topic has also been studied in surveys. So with apologies to David Letterman, here are 10 of the more common reasons for not doing defensible space, and some responses . . .

10. I’ve never seen a forest fire here in all my life.

Even prior to European settlement, moist forests in northern Idaho could go 50 years between ground fires, so it is very probable someone would not see a fire in their neighborhood for most of their life, particularly with modern fire suppression efforts. However, fire exclusion and selective cutting practices have changed the structure and species composition of Idaho forests significantly, resulting in a backlog of fuels. In many areas of Idaho, conditions are riper than ever for a forest fire.

9. The problem is on my neighbor’s property.

Obviously you can’t control your neighbor’s landscape. But high fire hazard on your neighbor’s property is all the more reason to make extra efforts to reduce risks you can control on your property. Recent research indicates features closest to the house (the home ignition zone) are the most important factors in whether a home burns down in a fire. So redouble efforts to reduce combustibles next to your house (e.g., needles collected in the gutters, firewood stored near the house). You can also share publications and other resources on this topic with your neighbors – sometimes all it takes is additional information from a third party to help people take action.

8. It’s not my job (I pay taxes to have my home protected from forest fire).

Some folks believe preventing their home from burning down in a fire is what they pay taxes for. And we do pay a lot of people to keep fires from burning down homes – whether the fire starts inside the house or in the woods. But fires do not always start and spread predictably. In a really big fire, no amount of manpower will be enough to protect all homes – especially homes that have not taken steps to reduce the flammability of their home and surrounding landscape and made their properties easily accessible to firefighters. You are more likely to get assistance from firefighters to the extent they have a fighting chance to survive defending your house.

7. I have no place to put the slash.

Disposing of trees, brush, and other organic materials accumulated in a fire risk reduction effort can be daunting. The standard method is to pile it and burn the piles. But that may not be possible at all times of the year. You can sometimes haul it to a dump, but that gets expensive, both for the landowner (if the dump charges fees) or the taxpayer who is paying for that space in the landfill. Another option is to have the material chipped and spread through the surrounding forest. This approach has the added advantage of helping to suppress the emergence of additional vegetation. Do not spread the material right next to the house (fire will follow it to your house), avoid piling it deeper than one inch (deeper accumulations interfere with air and water movement in your soils), and do not mix it in with soils (the microorganisms that decompose it will use up nitrogen in the soil, making it less available for trees). Some recycling centers provide a free drop for yard waste and chip it up to reduce landfill volume or provide it to landscapers for mulch.

6. I don’t know what to do.

Extension offices have a wealth of publications, workshops, videos, and assistance from master gardeners to help you to prune, thin, control brush and otherwise reduce fire risk. Most firefighting agencies also have information. Perhaps you’re not sure how to apply that in your specific context. There are a growing number of home landscaping services in Idaho who provide detailed on-site assistance with this for a fee.

5. I don’t have the time or money.

Some of the activities to reduce home fire risk in a forested setting can cost a lot of money (e.g., replacing a wood roof). Other activities, (thinning, pruning, etc.) are less expensive but require time and sweat equity. But think - how much is your home worth? The old car mechanics adage applies ("you can pay me now or pay me - more - later"). Thinning and pruning trees reduces fire risk and improves your landscape’s health, and may increase real estate value. Some Idaho communities now have grant funds available to help you hire someone to help you with some of these tasks – check with your local fire protection district about hazardous fuel treatment (HFT) funds.

4. I want it to be natural.

People have different ideas, in different contexts, for what is "natural". Historically, natural on many forested Idaho home sites would have meant ground fires coming through every 10-30 years killing small trees coming up in the understory (on medium to moist forests there would have been crown fires too). By that standard, many of our current forests are un-natural in both structure and species composition. Unless you are prepared to allow fires to burn through (and even then the results may not be natural, considering the historically unprecedented volume and configuration of fuels that have accumulated in the absence of fires), cutting excess small trees and shrubs in forest understory is one way of mimicking the effects of natural fires.

3. How can I make any difference for something as huge as a forest fire?

There are times when a fire is so powerful that all efforts to keep a house from burning down fail. However, this is a bit of a red herring. It is never a question of your home being at risk or not. The question is how to reduce your home’s risk. The practices that reduce ignition potential have saved a lot of homes. Unfortunately, you don’t usually hear as much about homes that survived forest fires as those which perish in them (seen any headlines to the effect of "dog doesn’t bite man?").

2. I want my trees dense to screen my neighbors.

Many homeowners live in rural areas because they value privacy. Frequently people want to leave trees dense to screen noise and visuals (e.g., your neighbor’s "outdoor antique car collection"). Some of this may be OK as long as the dense trees are at least 100 feet from your house. But even there, overcrowded trees are ultimately doomed to be killed by bark beetles, then present a greater fire risk. You are going to lose a lot of the screening effects anyway, as the lower branches of overcrowded trees die out from shade. Starting to thin them earlier will keep the lower branches longer. Additional screening could be provided by shrubs. If appropriate, earthen or other-non-organic screens provide a safer alternative than leaving dense stands of conifers.

1. It won’t look good.

The quick response to this is to ask how your landscape and home will look after a forest fire comes through. But aside from that, some folks fear that reducing their fire risk will result in their landscape looking like a "bunker" or a "lunarscape". You can have a fire resistive landscape that is still very green and naturalistic. In fact one of the ways to keep your home more resistive to fires is to keep the landscape well watered and green (e.g., the lawn). The primary focus on reducing fire risk is to reduce the continuity of fuels (especially closest to the house), not to remove vegetation from the landscape entirely.

Conclusion

Fire risk reduction is not something you can or need to complete perfectly at once. Indeed, you will never be completely done, because it is important to maintain the risk reduction you have started. But don’t let bad reasoning or uncertainty prevent you from taking the steps necessary to protect your home and surrounding forest.
_________________________

 1 Smith, E. and M Rebori. Factors Affecting Property Owner Decisions about Defensible Space. 2001. In: Forestry Extension: Assisting Forest Owner, Farmer and Stakeholder Decision-Making. Proceedings, 5th IUFRO (International Union of Forestry Research Organizations) Extension Working Party Symposium. D. Race and R. Reid, editors. Australian National University & CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry, Hobart Tasmania, Australia.


Forest Soils versus Agricultural Soils
Randy Brooks

Soil or dirt? What’s the difference? My college professor would get discombobulated when we called it dirt. So we posed the same question to him – what’s the difference? He said that soil is what plants grow in and dirt is what you get under your fingernails! Big deal, we thought.

As a medium for plant growth, soil can best be described as a complex natural material derived from disintegrated and decomposed rocks and organic materials, which provides nutrients, moisture, and anchorage for land plants. A soil can be considered a product of its environment. Soils are formed from parent material (rocks, volcanic ash, etc.), by the action of living organisms (plants, animals, and man), climate, and topography over time. Soils consist of four basic components: mineral materials, organic (living or once living) matter, water, and air. These are combined in widely varying amounts in different kinds of soil, and at different moisture levels, and can change as the environment changes or is modified.

Forest soils differ from agricultural soils in many respects. Agricultural soils were selected because of desirable chemical and physical properties. Foresters may regard the physical properties of soils as one of the more important factors. In agriculture soils chemical properties may be most important. In most areas of America, forest soils are those that were relatively undesirable for agriculture. Historically, the better soils have been cultivated while the poorer remained in native vegetation. Certain soil properties, such as rock content, prevent or restrict agricultural activities. Forest soils tend to be shallower with more rock than agricultural soils have. Since most forest soils occur on sloped terrain (especially in the west), they tend to be younger with more variability. Even so, some of these soil types can be very productive from a foresters perspective.

Fully developed forest soils are natural bodies with vertical layers. At the top is an organic surface layer or "forest floor" (O horizon) with subdivisions of fresh, undecomposed plant debris (Oi horizon, formerly called L); semi-decomposed, fragmented organic matter (Oe horizon, formerly called F) and humus; and amorphous organic matter without mineral material (Oa horizon, formerly called H). Below this surface layer is a mineral surface horizon (A); a subsurface mineral horizon often leached (E); a subsurface mineral horizon with features of accumulation (B horizon); a mineral horizon penetrable by roots (C); and locally hard bedrock (R). The E, B, C, and R horizon may be lacking, or the B horizon may be modified by groundwater or stagnant water. Forest soils usually are more shallow and rockier than agriculture soils. As a result, they tend to be more variable in their physical and chemical properties when compared to agricultural soils. The O horizon is usually more important in forest soil, as it is a primary source of nutrients.

Agricultural soils associated with rangelands and grasslands often have horizons similar to forested soils. However, if they are being cultivated, or have been in the past, they usually lack the organic (O horizon) layer. The A horizon usually has been mixed with parts of the E and even the B horizon, resulting in an artificial plow layer (Ap horizon). The B and/or C horizons may have been broken up by deep cultivation or ripping. The soils may have been so degraded by past human actions that they are no longer arable, as was the case in the southern United States before the large-scale commercial production of fertilizers. Such soils may still be classified as agricultural soils and used, for example, for grazing or non-cropping production. Agricultural soils are typically more uniform than their forested counterpart due to cultivation.

Recall that soils are formed from parent material. The nature of the parent material is of more importance in forest soils that in agriculture soils. As discussed by Ron Mahoney in Good Rocks/Bad Rocks, the Latest Piece of the Puzzle of Natural Forest Fertility (Woodland Notes, Vol. 8, No. 2, Winter, 1997), natural forest fertility can be traced to parent materials. More specifically, sedimentary rocks appear to be lower in nutrient values compared to soils formed from granites. In agriculture, fertilizers are added to amend any nutrient deficiencies. Thus, differences between the two soils are enhanced by the addition of agrichemicals and fertilizers.

Considering the natural landscape, you might wonder how native prairies and forests function in the absence of tillage and fertilizers. These soils are tilled by soil organisms, not machinery. They are fertilized too, but the "fertilizers" are used again and again, and never leave the site. Native soils are covered with a plant litter (the "O" horizon) and/or growing plants throughout the year. Beneath the surface litter layer, a rich complex of soil organisms decompose plant residue and dead roots, then release their stored nutrients slowly over time. In fact, topsoil is the most biologically diverse part of the earth. Soil dwelling organisms release bound up minerals, converting them into plant available forms that are then taken up by plants growing on the site. The organisms recycle nutrients again and again from the death and decay of each new generation of plants.

There are many different types of organisms that live in the topsoil, each contributing in some form or fashion to soil fertility and health. An acre of living topsoil typically contains approximately 900 pounds of earthworms, 2,400 pounds of fungi, 1,500 pounds of bacteria, 133 pounds of protozoans, 890 pounds of arthropods and algae, and even small animals, in some cases. Therefore, the soil can be viewed as a living community rather than an inert body. These numbers, especially for earthworms, can be reduced by farm tillage practices.

In conclusion, forest soils differ from agricultural soils in many respects. Vegetation, rock content, well defined profiles, chemical and physical properties, nature of parent materials, and location/topography are just some of the factors that separates these two types of soils. In either case, the soil can be managed to remain sustainable, but that is another topic for another issue!

For more information on soil and soil organisms, browse the following websites:

http://www.soilfoodweb.com/sfi_html/index.html

http://www.attra.org/attra-pub/soilmgmt.html

http://www.id.blm.gov/publications/crust/index.htm

http://www.liverpool.k12.ny.us/standards/lstandards/curriculum/sci/g3sci/soillayers.html


Moisture Stress: What Does That Mean for Trees?
Yvonne C. Barkley

With below average precipitation over several seasons, trees across Idaho, whether they are in your yard or out in the woods, are moisture stressed. Trees vary in their ability to tolerate moisture stress, with native trees having much more tolerance than planted trees and shrubs. Moisture stressed trees are much more susceptible to diseases, insect attacks, and injury by severe weather. Basically, moisture stress occurs when the amount of water going out of a tree is greater than the amount going in. All plants transpire, loosing water through the foliage to help cool the plant and also help move water from the roots to the leaves. When there is a shortage of water within the plant, foliage wilts. As moisture stress continues, symptoms such as browning of leaf margins and tips of leaves and needles occurs. Deciduous trees and shrubs will drop some or all of their leaves. If a severe shortage occurs over a period of several tears, branch and crown dieback, and eventually death of the entire plant will occur.

Moisture stress continues to happen over the winter, most notably in evergreen trees and shrubs, when water evaporates from leaves and stems when the soil is cold or frozen. Roots extract little moisture from cold soils and none from frozen soils and cannot replace moisture lost. Trees and shrubs subjected to winter moisture stress will show browned needles and may even die over the winter. This is commonly referred to as winter death.

Moisture stress related to dry soil can be alleviated by proper watering practices. Moisture stress is the primary cause of death for newly planted trees and shrubs, which need supplemental water every 7-10 days if there is not adequate rainfall. For all practical purposes, watering established trees and shrubs in times of drought will usually be restricted to those plants that are within distance of your longest hose.

It is very important that trees and shrubs receive enough water before the soil freezes. Most of a tree’s roots are located in the top two feet of soil. When watering, you want to soak the soil to a depth of at least 12 inches. Short, frequent watering usually does not penetrate much beyond the sod and organic matter layer of the soil profile.

There are several methods of deep watering your trees. The easiest way is to spiral a soaker hose around your trees and shrubs let the hose run slowly for at least four hours. Move the hose around the entire drip line of larger trees to ensure that all of the roots receive water.

Mulch is another way to conserve moisture around your trees and shrubs. Mulch is any material placed on the soil to cover and protect it. Common mulches are bark, wood chips, ornamental gravel, and landscape matting. Mulching will also help with weed and grass control and protect the lower portions of your trees and shrubs from mechanical injuries.

You can lessen the effects of drought on your forest trees by thinning both the trees and shrubs so you have less plant material per acre, leaving more moisture, light, and nutrients for those that you leave.

When all else fails, and you lose a tree or shrub to drought stress, take the time to replace the planting with a more suitably drought tolerant species. If you lost a birch to drought stress, do not replace it with another birch! Drought tolerant species include bur oak, Gamble oak, blue oak, black and honey locust, Rocky Mountain juniper, Austrian pine, and ponderosa pine. Drought intolerant species include birches, cottonwoods, poplars, spruces, and firs.

Remember the old adage "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"? In the case of deep watering your trees and shrubs before winter it proves only too true.