Fall 2009
Instructor: Chad Hoffman
Office Hours: I have an open door, phone and
email policy for my office hours. In general i will respond to any email or
phone call within 24 hours and for those who can stop by and see me I will make time to chat.
Office: Phinney Hall 306, University of
Idaho
Phone: 208-885-7115
Email: chadh@uidaho.edu
Course Objectives:
This online class is designed to give you an in-depth understanding of
fire ecology and management in a variety of wildland ecosystems. Fire
management involves predicting fire behavior and effects, as well as
making decisions about fire as appropriate to natural resource management
objectives.
Fire management options vary
greatly, and may include fuels management and education, fire suppression,
wildland fire use, and igniting and managing a prescribed fire, post-fire rehabilitation,
or no action. You will learn
about the ecological effects of fire on plants, animals, soil, water and
air. Our discussions about fire management will address current issues,
including fire management in the wildland/urban interface, climate change,
and effects of fires on watersheds, streams and riparian areas. We'll also
read current scientific literature to gain familiarity with fire ecology
research. We will emphasize fire as an ecological process in wildland
ecosystems, how to characterize and predict fire effects over time and
space, and how to apply this to restoration ecology.
Upon completing this course, you and the other students will be able to:
-
Understand fire as an ecological and physical
process.
-
Describe the effects of individual fires and fire regimes
on ecosystem processes.
-
Apply concepts of fire ecology to predict the
effects of fire on species composition, structure, and function of ecosystems.
- Apply your fire ecology knowledge to
restoration ecology, including key concepts, the use of fire in
restoration.
Format:
The class sessions will be a combination of powerpoint presentations,
discussion, and a research project.
Reading:
The required text for this
course is: Agee, J. K. 1993. Fire
ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. New York: Island Press.
Additional reading
assignments will be made for discussions, including a number of journal articles
(available electronically from the UI library). To complete assignments, you
must do extensive independent library research and reading of journal articles.
Grading:
For all written assignments 10% of the your grade will be based on
organization, clarity of reasoning, grammar, and spelling.
Your final grade will be assigned according to the University of Idaho
scale (90-100%=A, 80-89%=B, etc.) based on points earned out of total
available:
| |
POINTS |
| Exams (3, each 150 points) |
450 |
| Student Research Presentations |
350 total |
| Part I |
75 |
| Part II |
125 |
| Part III |
150 |
| Ah Moments (4, each worth 25 pts) |
100 |
| Online Discussions (4, each worth 25 pts) |
100 |
| TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE IN THE
CLASS |
1000 |
Exams: Three exams will
focus on concepts and definitions (with examples), as well as on issues and
applications in fire ecology and management. Exams will include short essay questions
which will require you to utilize class readings, current fire ecology tools and
the internet.
Student Research
Presentations:
This assignment will consist of 3 interrelated parts which are described
below and which will all be submitted in Blackboard. I expect you to submit all
these assignments in blackboard on time. If assignments are submitted late I
will subtract 5% of the grade every other day until it is submitted, unless you
have made prior arrangements with me to hand in your assignment late.
-
Part I: The
first part of this project is for you to brainstorm and develop a short
(no more than 3 page) abstract outlining a topic related to fire ecology
which you would like to research. You should highlight the specific
question you will research, why you choose this topic, why it is
important, and show an outline of your paper. Your outline should
include proposed headings and a brief description of what you might
discuss (this should be the bulk of your write up) as well as a list of
what primary literature you plan on using (you need at least 5 papers or
books for full credit). I will review your proposals and provide
you comments on your topic. this part of the project is worth 75 points and is required to move on to part II.
Failure to hand in Part one will disqualify you from receiving a grade
on part two and three of this assignment.
-
Part II:
The second part of this project is for
you to write a 5 to 10 page paper following your outline (not including
figures and literature cited). This is not a first draft. It should be
an example of solid professional work as it is worth 125 points. I will
provide comments back to you on this paper so you can update and hand in
a polished version in part 3. I strongly advise you to share this
version with other students in the class so that you can incorporate
their feedback and produce a strong paper.
In general I expect these papers to be
formatted as a scientific paper, you should include an introduction which
discusses the importance and background of your topic followed by several paragraphs discussing the specific
details of
your topic. You should include literature to help support your claims
and discussions. Followed by a discussion and conclusion section where
you provide a summary of the important ideas form your paper and discuss
the future of this topic.
-
Part III: In
this part of the assignment you will update part 2 based on my
comments. Along with your updated paper you will also submit a
document outlining how you handled the comments I provided you. This
outline should included whether or not you made the recommended changes
and justify any situations where you did not take my recommendations
into account.
Grading Rubric for Student
Presentations Part I, II and III
|
|
Possible Points
Part I |
Possible Points Part
II |
Possible Points
Part III |
|
The issue is very
clearly stated. Author explains why it is an issue and what is
significant about it. Paper is focused on the issue. |
25 |
30 |
45 |
|
Opinion is
presented at end (but only at the end), it is clearly identified as the opinion of the author, and
it is well justified and well-explained. |
0 |
20 |
30 |
|
Examples and
diverse citations are used effectively to support and lend credibility
to the introduction, different sides of the issues, and opinion. |
10 |
25 |
30 |
|
Correct grammar,
spelling and punctuation. No slang. Limited use of technical jargon.
Terms are defined. Tables and figures, if any, are used effectively,
formatted correctly, referred to in the text., and the source(s) of data
are identified in the title of the table(s) or figure(s). |
10 |
15 |
25 |
|
Very well
organized; reasoning is clear and logical throughout; writing is
concise; writer incorporates current information etc... |
30 |
35 |
45 |
|
TOTAL |
75 |
125 |
175 |
Aha
Moments:
Throughout each topic in this course you may
experience what is termed an "Aha!" moment. These are moments when something you
have been reading or contemplating makes sense with an unexpected clarity. I
will ask you to post on of your "Aha!' moments for different topics throughout
the course. At the end of the semester I will also ask you to pick what you
think is your best "Aha!" moment from this class.
For
each Aha moment you should explain in some detail what the moment was, and
why this moment seemed important to you in terms of your learning. In
general I would like you to contemplate the experience and synthesize it
within the context of other newly acquired knowledge.
Online Discussions:
You will be graded on the basis of your input for each online discussion. One
third of your grade will be based upon quantity, but 2/3 of your grade will be
based upon quality (clarity of ideas and critical thinking) using the following
grading rubric:
Online Discussion
and Aha Moments Grading Rubric
| |
Points |
Quantity |
Quality |
 |
| 90% |
The student posted
significantly more than two times on each discussion |
The student used new
vocabulary and readings, and clearly stated his/her rationale. In addition,
student's comments build upon previous comments and relate the comments
to the original question. |
 |
|
80% |
The student posted at
least twice on each discussion |
The student used
information and vocabulary from the required readings and presentation
and clearly stated the rationale behind their thoughts. Student's comments
build upon both the original question and other student comments. |
 |
| >
80% |
Students posted fewer than twice on each discussion |
Student did not adequately
use vocabulary and information from the required readings and/or did
not clearly explain their rationale. Student did not clearly build upon
other students' comments. |
 |
|
0 |
You will get a
score of zero if you do not participate in the threaded discussion
within the 2 weeks available for each topic. |
 |
Writing and deadlines:
All of your written assignments must be submitted in
Blackboard typed, double-spaced in 12-point font. Be sure to properly cite the source of your ideas to lend
support and credibility to your assignment.
Late papers and assignments will occur a reduction of 5% every
day until they are submitted, unless prior arrangements have been made.
Plagiarism will NOT be
tolerated: In this class, you must summarize, paraphrase, quote and
reference sources to avoid plagiarism in your writing.
Academic honesty is
expected of you at the University of Idaho. Consistent with the
plagiarism policy
of the Department of Forest Resources,
plagiarism will not be tolerated. Plagiarism violates the code of academic
conduct at the University of Idaho. Under
UI policy, regulation O-2,
"Consequences for academic dishonesty may be imposed by the course
instructor. Such consequences may include but cannot exceed a grade of
"F" in the course". If you are
accused of plagiarism, you must meet with the course instructor and the chair of
the department to discuss the evidence, circumstances, and consequences. If you
have indeed plagiarized text, you will receive 0 points on the assignment, you
may fail the course and your unethical behavior will affect recommendations for
jobs and graduate school.
Cite sources to support and
lend credibility to your writing. Please be careful in citing
sources for your ideas when you write. You should be aware that web-based
searches for plagiarized text have become quite sophisticated. Even a sentence
or two plagiarized in a long document is inexcusable. It is very tempting and
easy to copy text directly, but it works against the educational process and is
a form of theft.
There are some good examples of plagiarized text as well as acceptable
alternatives on the
Forest
Resources Departmental web site and elsewhere on
the World Wide Web.
Accommodations for disabilities: Reasonable
accommodations are available for students who have a documented
disability. Please notify the instructor during the first week of class of
any accommodations needed for the course. Late notification may mean
that requested accommodations might not be available. All accommodations
must be approved through Disability Support Services located in the Idaho
Commons Building, Rm. 333, 885-7200,dss@uidaho.edu.
|