HGM: Using the Functional Assessment Guidelines
1. The accounting matrix: Function Loss vs. Function Created (Damage/Mitigation) (Project/Restoration Wetland Index)
2. Use of reference wetlands
- a similar kind of wetlandb) Takes into account- in the same watershed
- seasonal differencesc) Should pick up changes due to impacts-natural variation
- climatic cycles
4. 1999 "Methods for Assessing Wetland Functions: Riverine and Depressional Wetlands in the Lowlands of Western Washington"
a) Focus is on Riverine and Depressional Wetlandsb) There is overlap (Images)
-depressional outflow-depressional closed
-riverine impounding
-riverine flow-through
5. Functions are placed in three categories
Water Quality Improvement
Potential for removing sediment
Potential for removing nutrients
Potential for removing heavy metals and toxic organics
Hydrology
Potential for reducing peak flows
Potential for decreasing downstream erosion
Potential for recharging groundwater
Habitat Suitability
General habitat
Invertebrate habitat
Amphibian habitat
Anadromous fish habitat
Resident fish habitat
Wetland-associated bird habitat
Wetland-associatesd mammal habitat
Native plant richness
Potential for primary production and organic export
6. Example of assessment of a function
b) Variables represent measurable environmental characteristics (D - values or Data values) that are considered important in the performance of a function.
c) Function scores are calculated for
-effectiveness-reduced performance
a) Calculation page for "Depressional Outflow Wetlands - Function: Removing Sediment"b) "Model at a Glance"
Variables (V storage, etc.)
-description
-what is measured
- rationale
c) D - (Data) values